Friday, 27 February 2026

GCP Console Log Analysis Using Claude.ai (Step-by-Step)

 

Why combine GCP Logging + Claude.ai?

GCP Cloud Logging is great at collecting and searching logs, but it’s easy to get lost when:

  • there are too many services involved,

  • errors spike suddenly,

  • you need a clean timeline and root cause narrative,

  • you want faster query iteration.

Claude.ai helps by:

  • turning raw log snippets into summaries and hypotheses,

  • generating and refining Logging queries,

  • suggesting next checks (metrics, traces, deploy changes),

  • helping you write an RCA-style explanation.

Important: Don’t paste secrets (API keys, tokens, customer PII). Redact before sharing with Claude.

Step 0 — Prereqs & setup checklist

Before you start, confirm:

  • You have access to the relevant GCP Project

  • You can open Cloud Logging → Logs Explorer

  • You know the time window of the issue (e.g., “Feb 26 10:00–11:00 IST”)

  • You know the impacted surface area (service name, URL, job name, GKE namespace, etc.)

Optional but helpful:

  • Cloud Monitoring charts open in another tab

  • Release/deploy history (Cloud Deploy, GKE rollout history, GitOps, etc.)

Step 1 — Locate logs in GCP Console (Logs Explorer)

  1. Open GCP Console → Logging → Logs Explorer

  2. Pick the correct Project

  3. Set the time range:

    • Start wide (e.g., last 24 hours), then narrow to incident window.

  4. Start with a basic filter:

    • resource type (GKE, Cloud Run, Compute Engine, etc.)

    • service / container / function name

    • severity >= ERROR (if debugging failures)

Quick starting query examples (Logging Query Language)

Errors across project

severity>=ERROR

Cloud Run service

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="YOUR_SERVICE"
severity>=ERROR

GKE container logs

resource.type="k8s_container"
resource.labels.cluster_name="YOUR_CLUSTER"
resource.labels.namespace_name="YOUR_NAMESPACE"
labels.k8s-pod/app="YOUR_APP" OR resource.labels.pod_name:"YOUR_APP"
severity>=ERROR

Step 2 — Identify the “signature” of the problem

In Logs Explorer:

  1. Sort by newest first

  2. Look for repeating error messages:

    • same exception type

    • same endpoint

    • same upstream dependency

  3. Open a few representative log entries and note:

    • severity

    • textPayload or jsonPayload

    • request IDs / trace IDs

    • HTTP status (httpRequest.status)

    • latency (httpRequest.latency)

    • labels (pod, revision, region)

Output you want from this step

  • The most common error pattern (example: “502 from upstream”, “DB timeout”, “permission denied”, “OOMKilled”)

  • The top 2–3 services or components involved

  • A small set of 5–10 log entries that represent the issue

Step 3 — Redact and send a “log pack” to Claude.ai

Create a small “log pack” to paste into Claude:

  • 5–10 log entries (or key fields)

  • timeframe

  • what changed recently (deploy, config, traffic, dependency)

How to format the prompt to Claude

Use a structured prompt like this:

Prompt template

  • Context: system/service, timeframe, symptoms

  • Evidence: log snippets (redacted)

  • Ask: summarize patterns, propose hypotheses, propose next queries

Example prompt

We’re investigating an error spike in GCP Logging.
Time window: 10:00–11:00 IST.
Platform: Cloud Run (service: checkout-api).
Symptom: increase in 5xx responses.
Here are 8 representative log entries (redacted).
Tasks:

  1. Identify recurring patterns and likely root causes

  2. Suggest 6–10 GCP Logs Explorer queries to validate hypotheses

  3. Suggest the next 5 debugging steps in priority order

Paste the logs below that.

Step 4 — Ask Claude to extract structure and propose hypotheses

What Claude should produce:

  • a short summary of what’s happening

  • top likely causes (ranked)

  • which signals confirm/deny each cause

  • suggested next queries

Example analysis questions to ask

  • “Group these logs into 2–4 error categories.”

  • “What’s the most likely upstream dependency causing this?”

  • “Which fields should I chart or aggregate?”

  • “Write queries to find if this started right after a deploy.”

  • “Suggest a query to isolate a single request end-to-end using traceId.”

Step 5 — Use Claude-generated queries in Logs Explorer and iterate

Take Claude’s suggested queries and run them in Logs Explorer.

Useful iterative patterns:

A) Pinpoint by endpoint or status code

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="checkout-api"
httpRequest.status>=500
jsonPayload.request.path="/checkout"

B) Find timeouts / latency spikes

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="checkout-api"
httpRequest.latency>="2s"

C) Search by exception type/message

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="checkout-api"
textPayload:"TimeoutError" OR textPayload:"deadline exceeded"

D) Compare before vs after a timestamp (deploy correlation)

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="checkout-api"
timestamp>="2026-02-27T04:30:00Z"
severity>=ERROR

E) Isolate a revision (Cloud Run rollout issue)

resource.type="cloud_run_revision"
resource.labels.service_name="checkout-api"
resource.labels.revision_name="checkout-api-00042-xyz"
severity>=ERROR

Each time you run a query:

  1. Note what changed (count, category, specific dependency)

  2. Paste only the relevant findings back to Claude

  3. Ask Claude to refine hypotheses and produce the next best query set

Step 6 — Use aggregation: counts, breakdowns, and top offenders

In Logs Explorer, use:

  • Histogram to see spikes

  • Group by (when available) or use Log Analytics (BigQuery-backed) if enabled

  • Filter by labels: region, revision, pod, node, status code

Ask Claude:

  • “What should I break down by first: revision, endpoint, region, or dependency?”

  • “Give me a query that isolates errors only from region X.”

  • “Suggest a way to validate if only one pod/revision is bad.”

Step 7 — Correlate with Monitoring/Trace (optional but powerful)

Logs alone show symptoms. To identify root cause faster, correlate:

  • Cloud Monitoring: CPU, memory, restarts, latency

  • Cloud Trace: request traces (if trace IDs present)

  • Error Reporting: grouped exceptions

  • Deploy logs: rollout time, config changes

Ask Claude:

  • “Given these logs, which Monitoring chart should I inspect next?”

  • “What metrics would confirm memory pressure vs DB latency?”

  • “Write a short RCA narrative draft based on evidence.”

Step 8 — Turn findings into an RCA-style summary (Claude helps)

Give Claude:

  • confirmed cause

  • evidence (counts, timestamps, specific messages)

  • impact (errors, latency, users affected)

  • mitigation steps

  • prevention items

Ask Claude to generate:

  • incident summary (5–8 lines)

  • timeline (T-0 spike, deploy time, mitigation time)

  • root cause statement

  • action items with owners and priority labels

Step 9 — Best practices (don’t skip these)

Redaction & safety

Before pasting to Claude, remove:

  • Authorization headers / tokens

  • customer emails/phone/order IDs

  • internal IPs if sensitive

  • database connection strings

Improve future log analysis

  • log structured JSON (not only plain text)

  • include correlation IDs (requestId, traceId)

  • include key dimensions (service, region, revision, endpoint)

  • standardize error payload format

  • add severity properly (INFO/WARN/ERROR)

Example “Claude loop” workflow (fast iteration)

  1. Run broad query in Logs Explorer → get 10 representative errors

  2. Claude: summarize + hypothesize + produce queries

  3. Run 3–5 queries → collect results (counts, timestamps, top labels)

  4. Claude: refine hypothesis + propose next queries + draft RCA

  5. Validate in GCP (Monitoring/Trace/Deploy) → final conclusion

at
Labels: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)